Abrahamic Faith                                        Shalom Shalom (Peace Peace)                                        
Shalom Shalom




Simon Altaf with Howard Conder on Revelation TV




Its a package take it and be guaranteed eternity with Him or remain outside to suffer eternally. Choice is clear, either you have the Son or you have nothing!


For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:

Psalm 83:5


Tell your friends about this website and the wonderful truth contained

Enter Email:

 

Response to Assemblies of God

 

July 12, 2006

TO: Pastor Lee McFarland

Senior Pastor

Radiant Church

15522 W. Paradise Ln.

Surprise, AZ 85374

www.radiantchurch.com & www.mychurchrocks.com

email:  pastor.lee@RadiantChurch.com

 

RESPONSE TO ASSEMBLY OF GOD PASTORS

 LEE MCFARLAND

&

ANTHONY NIGER, II

REGARDING CHARGES OF LIBEL AND SLANDER

Dear Pastor Lee McFarland and all Assembly of God pastors,

I just received a copy of your June 30, 2006 response to Philip Powell's letter that Philip just sent to Assembly of God pastors and a host of other ministries around the world regarding Rick Warren's teachings and other nefarious practices going on within the AOG.  (Philip Powell is the Christian Ministries Fellowship Director and former General Secretary for the Australian Assemblies of God.)  Philip Powell has already responded to AOG Pastor Lee McFarland's as well as AOG Pastor Anthony Niger II's letters accusing Philip of libel and slander against Rick Warren.  What follows is my response to these very serious charges, as well as a response to Pastor McFarland's  original letter to me, and my response to both you and Pastor Niger's charges against Philip Powell and me and Dr. Opal Reddin.  Before I begin, it is most relevant that I remind you all of the following Scriptures:

“These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:

A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,

An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.”  Proverbs 6:16-19

“Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.”  Exodus 23:1

“This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.

For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,

Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,” 2 Timothy 3:1-3

 

Your original letter was not even addressed to me personally; I was just one of many people you sent your open letter to.  So it was not clear that you were expecting a response from me.  But since I have now learned that you did want a direct response, I am happy to respond.

Before I address your accusations, I would like to begin by telling all of you that I and a number of other ministries with whom I correspond are constantly receiving SOS emails from all over the world from victims of purpose-driven philosophies.  One SOS phone call particularly stands out in my mind.   I received the call from a grown daughter of the wife of a deacon who had been a member of his church for 57 years and the wife had been married to him for 44 years. Her husband and two other long-standing deacons were ousted for opposing Rick Warrens teachings and programs being imported into their church.  In this phone call, the daughter described to me that her mother was rolled up in the fetal position on her couch crying out in agony for how her beloved husband's reputation had been destroyed both in her church and community ever since he had come out against purpose-driven philosophy.  This man as well as the two other elder deacons in the faith who were removed, are perfect portrayals of the types of Christian whom Rick Warren would identify as “pillars” and “resisters” and more recently as ones who “have to die” in the process of transforming to become a purpose-driven church.  I have been able to verify the story about this church by the testimony of two or more.  But the absolute proof came in the form of a recording which I personally heard of the kangaroo court that was held at this church two days later documenting that due process was thrown out the window.  A reporter from a major newspaper in New England flew down to this city and  has now written the story soon to be published.

Rick Warren claims that he cannot be responsible for everything done in his name.  However, in this case he is responsible because he trains leaders of churches how to get rid of resisters and pillars, such as how his partner, Dan Southerland, Director of Church Transitions calls resisters “Sanballats...leaders from Hell”.  So of course Rick Warren is responsible, similar to how the RICO Act (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) holds leaders of racketeering accountable, though they cleverly leave no trail and disavow any knowledge or connection to their crimes.  The Church has this already in place if leaders in churches would actually implement what Scripture teaches concerning church discipline.  And note...we are not aware of any published compassion and grieving or restitution for any of these saints from Rick Warren, whose programs purpose-drive non-compliant Christians out of churches in a host of Christian Denominations.  And with few exceptions, the majority of AOG Pastors followed suit and likewise demonstrated no mercy or compassion for the Christians documented in the Spiritual Euthanasia article that was sent to them (available at: http://www.letusreason.org/Current61.htm).  Most simply ignored their plight and failed to even respond.  And many that did actually attacked AOG matriarch Dr. Opal Reddin, following the example set by their leader Tom Trask who had already publicly humiliated her in the U.S. National AOG General Assembly (where is his apology to her?).  These AOG pastors can attack and malign a God-fearing Christian widow who was in her 80s with impunity or simply look the other way.  But I will continue to defend her as well as all of the Christians that Warren has orphaned from their churches.  Of course they are not true orphans, for the Lord is their refuge and strong tower.

In your recent letter to Philip Powell you stated:

“I never received a response to my email to James Sundquist, so the fact that you responded is refreshing.”

I would like to reply: 

1.  I am quite shocked you would attempt to correct Philip Powell regarding Matthew 18, while you failed to contact me personally that you were offended that I did not respond to you.  In fact you publicly copied your letter to me to a number of AOG pastors before and without even following your admonition to comply with Matthew 18.  If you did not receive a response from me in a timely matter, you had but ask me.  I receive thousands of emails from all over the world and try to answer as many as possible, particularly the growing number of SOS calls and letters I receive from saints who have been purpose-driven out of their churches, for as Rick Warren recently stated...”they have to die” right? 

2.  Your letter of personal dismay at me was also not written to me first or even addressed to me, but copied to a number of people publicly on the Internet.

3.  If Matthew 18 is so urgent, why are you a follower of Rick Warren who does not comply with Matthew 18 and to date has still not responded to my two emails to him?  Rick Warren has exempted himself from Matthew 18....though many have confronted him with his fraudulent teachings....this is also publicly known and documented in my book as well.   I agree with Philip Powell's response to you regarding Matthew 18 and Rick Warren.  I am very surprised you would not know that Matthew 18 applies primarily to private matters vs. public teaching.  I am equally surprised at the number of Assembly of God pastors would have such a poor understanding of Matthew 18 (shared by Rick Warren, as evidenced by his response to Deborah Dombrowski of Lighthouse Trails Publishing), who have responded to me in the same manner.  By the way, since you have transmitted and published that you have something against Deborah Dombrowski (or George Mair for that matter), I am sure you must have gone to her privately, since this is your interpretation of Matthew 18.  You have accused Philip Powell of not following Matthew 18, right, before he went public with passing Rick Warren's letter around.   Did you even bother to hear Deborah's side of the story?  Where is her side of the story in your email to Philip Powell?  Public false teaching must be exposed publicly.  There is nothing private about Warren's published teachings.

4.  Regarding your commentary on Deborah Dombrowski which you sent to Philip Powell, now both you and Rick Warren have borne false witness against her.  Before you continue to pass on these false accusations all of you need to read her rebuttal of Rick Warren's charges.  I also have that letter Rick Warren sent to her and can prove that his statements about his relationship with Ken Blanchard and his claim of no knowledge of the PDC conference in Nairobi are full of falsehood (I have the tapes of the speakers at conference who were sent by Rick Warren and even announced a direct message from him, which Pastor Bob DeWaay also heard and can confirm.) Here is the context and quote from the Nairobi conference that Rick Warren claims no knowledge of:

 

The Bishop at the Nairobi, Kenya PDC Conference at Nairobi Pentecostal Church introduced Todd Hudnall as one of the staff of PDC.  "He (Rick Warren) has brought around himself some choice men"... He has also been one of men on the team of the Purpose-Driven Church.   He (Todd Hudnall) is here today representing our dear brother Dr. Rick Warren."  He welcomes Todd Hudnall, who was directly commissioned by Rick Warren himself.

 

AOG PASTOR TODD HUDNALL:

 

"In behalf of Rick Warren I want to pass along that he is delighted that you are here to hear this word from God today...”

 

So now let us contrast this with:

Written Friday, November 18, 2005 at 3:32 AM in the morning, with Rick Warren as the header, we were also able to track down the ISP (Internet Service Provider) for this email, tracing it directly to Saddleback Church. Here is what the November 18, 2005 email from rdw@saddleback.net says:

 

 

“Subject: 'Don't pass on lies'

Dear Angela,

The website you refer to below is well-known for publishing lies. which can easily be proven false.  For instance, it says Pastor Warren was to speak at Nairobi Pentecostal Church from Nov 8 to 11.  This is flatly false, as Pastor Warren has never been to this church, never heard of this church, and was here in America the entire time. ....

Correspondence team”

Never heard of it huh?  I am afraid it is Rick Warren who is not telling the truth, not Deborah Dombrowski! Here is the real story:  http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/report.htm.  For more documentation and proof, please contact Angela at: angela@n8tnt.com

5.  I have written two letters of appeal to AOG Pastor Tommy Barnett in Phoenix, near you, and he has failed to respond.  Both of my letters to Assembly of God's Gabriele Rienas were ignored as well.

 

6.     Ninety-nine plus percent of the recipients of my letter to thousands of AOG pastors, which contained Dr. Opal Reddin's letter, did not respond.  Of the approximately 50 responses I did receive, most were retaliatory, attacking me personally. These responses mirrored how pastors have treated members in their churches who even question Rick Warren's teachings.  NONE refuted me from Scripture disproving my specific charges against Rick Warren, nor did they reason from Scripture as Paul tells us to do.  And virtually none had any concern whatsoever for what Tom Trask did to Opal Reddin and no concern whatsoever for the host of victims left strewn in Warren's path, such as what AOG Pastor Wayde Goodall did to members of the First Assembly of God in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Several responses were very encouraging, particularly from those pastors who were students Dr. Opal Reddin at the Assembly of God's Central Bible College where she taught.   So if failure to respond to letters of appeal is any criteria for being an AOG pastor, you have picked the wrong denomination, as it appears that ignoring letters is standard operational procedure within the AOG. Even George Wood, one of your top executives within the AOG teaches ignoring “detractors” (a true Biblical response would require them to respond).  I am surprised you would not follow Wood's party line policy to write me. I am also surprised that you would expect a response from me.

Now I would like to respond to your accusations in your original 2/22/06 letter to me which you sent in response to my general letter of appeal to all Assembly of God pastors:

You have provided evidence that Rick Warren has used the term “repentance”.  But as Bob DeWaay's new book Redefining Christianity, Understanding the Purpose Driven Movement, points out, Warren has redefined repentance from historical biblical orthodox Christianity, and not repentance alone, but a number of terms.  The dictionary definition falls short of the biblical meaning because one could “repent” from being a Protestant and become a Roman Catholic as Malcolm Muggeridge did.  One could repent from being a Southern Baptist and become a Muslim, as one man reported in the news did.  One can repent from going in one wrong direction and simply go in an equally wrong direction.  If Rick Warren teaches true biblical repentance as you claim, he would have “changed his mind” about his false teaching about the 40 day biblical examples he gives which are false in ANY translation you can find, which I will prove below. If Rick Warren teaches true biblical repentance as you claim, he would have “changed his mind” about his false teaching about the covenants and vows in clear defiance of both Christ's and the Apostle James' warning and instead of forcing his members to take them, found in Matthew and James.

If Rick Warren teaches true biblical repentance as you claim, he would have “changed his mind” about promoting his Carl Jung-based personality temperament divination embedded in his SHAPE Program (also mandatory of his church members).  If Rick Warren teaches true biblical repentance as you claim, he would have “changed his mind” about his false teaching about the Fear of the Lord, Doctrine, and Prophecy, as I proved in my first book.  You talk about failing to respond.  Neither you nor Anthony Niger, II responded to any of these documented examples.  Both of you accused Philip Powell of libel and slander or being a false teacher, but provided no specific evidence, exactly what Thomas Trask failed to provide in his charges and removal of AOG NY District Director Brother Adour or AOG Pastor Ray Barnett.  If Rick Warren teaches true biblical repentance as you claim, he would have “changed his mind” about his false teaching about the 40 years example of Moses in the Wilderness of how people who oppose him “have to die”...saints purchased by the blood of Jesus.  If Rick Warren teaches true biblical repentance as you claim, he would have “changed his mind” about his false teaching in his Ladies Home Journal column which exalts self, says nothing about repentance, and does not mention the Cross.  In fact, it is another gospel!   If Rick Warren teaches true biblical repentance as you claim, he would have “changed his mind” what he taught in the Jewish synagogue recently in which he does not even name the name of Jesus, the very opposite of what Paul preached every time he went into a synagogue.  Warren comes out with all men speaking well of him, while Paul often gets stoned or put on trial after speaking in synagogues.  Even if your account of Warren preaching repentance were 100% Biblical, it is nullified by his much more public published articles, books, and public speaking engagements.

Before I address further proof that Warren's teachings belie what you defend in Warren, I would like to point you to the following blog which is an apt description that Warren's definition of repentance is not biblical:

http://transformingsermons.blogspot.com/2006/02/preaching-repentance.html

(Scroll down to: 10:53 pm Douglas, Preaching repentance)

Did it every occur to any of you that Philip Powell did not simply make this up as a vain imagination, but rather that he was telling the truth, and doing so with specific documentation?  So your accusation against AOG matriarch Dr. Opal Reddin is without foundation.  Opal was right all along!

LEE MCFARLAND:

I just have to respond to this email that was in my “inbox” this morning… (see original email at the bottom)… because I believe it could stumble many.   It seems like somebody is trying to carry the “banner for truth”… but I believe they are mistaken.....James Sundquist is actually asking us to read this letter “OUT LOUD” to our congregations… oh my goodness…. please do not do that… that sounds like a recommendation from somebody who does not understand the dynamics of an effective church service…  

 

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

How could you rebuke Philip Powell for not using Matthew 18 against Rick Warren, but on the other hand suggest that I or any Christian NOT exercise Matthew 18 and other biblical passages in which we are commanded to mark false teachers and expose the deeds of darkness publicly before the congregation as Paul did and commanded us to do which he did “OUT LOUD” publicly and before the congregation that all might fear the Lord and that the flock would be spared from wolves as well as wolves in sheep's clothing.  What other biblical protocol is there?  (Matthew 18 would require going before the congregation if an offending brother does not repent.)

LEE MCFARLAND:

Why would somebody be so against something that simply uses the Bible to explain what we should be doing as a church?  Here is a statement right out of “The Purpose Driven Church”…

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

Calling Rick Warren's teaching using the Bible does not make it so.  Rick Warren does not “simply use the Bible” but a host of corrupt translations.  As to how he does use the Bible, I have shown both above and with more examples to follow.   You are completely wrong!

LEE MCFARLAND (citing Rick Warren):

We believe a great commitment to the great COMMANDMENT and the great COMMISSION will grow a great church!”

The Great Commandment:Jesus said, ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart...soul...and mind.  This is the first and greatest commandment.  And the second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself.  All the Law and Prophets hang on these two commandments.’”  Matt. 22:36-40

 

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

This quote (“will grow a great church”) of Rick Warren by Lee McFarland has no basis in Scripture – it is an invention of the mass marketing types like Warren's mentor Peter Drucker.  Churches are not grown through this means in any biblical sense.  When the mass marketing types talk about growth, they are referring to numbers.  The emphasis is on getting as many people as possible inside a building/organization.  Pure doctrine, holiness, repentance and the like become secondary...if they exist at all.   This is contrary – broadly and specifically – to Scripture.  Rev 2&3 sums up concerning church growth – it is a growth in maturity which encompasses three fundamental aspects:  exceeding in devoted love for the brothers, moral purity, and doctrinal purity.  Mt 7:13-14 directly contradicts these mass marketing gurus and their false doctrines:

“Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.” Mt. 7:13-14

LEE MCFARLAND (citing Rick Warren):

The Great Commission:Jesus said, ‘Go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.”  Matt. 28:19-20

 

•     To “Love God with all your heart” is “WORSHIP”.

 

•     To “Love your neighbor as yourself” is “MINISTRY”.

 

•     To “Go...make disciples” is “EVANGELISM”.

 

•     To “Baptize...” is to “INCORPORATE INTO FELLOWSHIP”.

 

•     To “Teach them...all things” is “DISCIPLESHIP”.

 

LEE MCFARLAND:

“How can you argue against the five purposes right out of the Great Commandment and the Great Commission?   Ministry, Discipleship, Evangelism, Worship, and Fellowship – which of those words is not Biblical, or causes people to do something evil?” 

 

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

Here is how I can argue against it.  Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Roman Catholics, and yes even Muslims carry out these five purposes of Rick Warren (Ministry, Discipleship, Evangelism, Worship, and Fellowship).  Lee McFarland mimics the same error as his fellow AOG Pastor Niger II, Calvary Assembly in Carthage, NY who stated:. 

“All the 5 Purposes (Worship, Fellowship, Discipleship, Ministry and Evangelism) are all Biblical Principals found throughout the Book of Acts and can even be found in our own 16 Statements of Fundamental Truths.”

 

Pastor Bob DeWaay demolishes the stronghold of this argument with this commentary on Pastor Niger, II's statements: 

“This would only be true if Rick Warren had the same definitions for these purposes that the Bible does. For Warren Worship = music that entertains the unregenerate; Fellowship = getting together with the unregenerate to study Warren’s materials; Discipleship = SHAPE which is the study of “self” not denying self as the Bible defines discipleship; Ministry = serving Warren’s PEACE plan which has nothing to do with the great commission; Evangelism = doing marketing surveys of worldly minded people to find out what they want and then give that to them. NONE of this has anything to do with what the Bible tells us to do. He has redefined every one of these words and then convinced people that his program is what Christ had in mind. The big question is: “why are evangelicals so deceived that they cannot see through this deception?”

          -  Pastor Bob DeWaay, Twin Cities Fellowship.

 

 

 

What Warren, McFarland, and Niger II have done here is not directly presenting evil – he has presented distortions of what the goals are for the Christian.  RW is a slippery fellow and is one of the best of the syncretists out there.  By doing this, how can a man of God ever fulfill his duty to test the spirits and mark those who are teaching falsely? By using McFarland's defense of Warren as a template, anyone could prove that even a Mormon is a faithful Christian. In fact, there is nothing in what McFarland presented as examples of Warren's faithful teaching that a Mormon would not likewise teach!  In fact, except for the “P” in Warren's Global Peace Plan which calls for planting churches, Islam can Equip leaders, Assist the Poor, Care for the Sick, and Educate the next generation. And every Christian cult and Roman Catholicism already does all of the letters of Warren's Global Peace Plan.  The question is, what ELSE are Mormons or other professed Christian leaders like Rick Warren teaching that does not line up with Scripture? This is the crux of the matter!  Is it not a pastor's biblical obligation to his flock to be diligent in exposing all falsehood no matter the source? Why is Warren apparently exempt from McFarland's deeper testing?  Pastor McFarland is failing in his pastoral duty to discern "wolves in sheep's clothing" (Matt. 7:15) and those that appear as "angels of light" (2 Cor. 11:14). In both cases, anyone with little discernment can point to the appearance of sheep's clothing or the appearance of light to prove that these teachers are faithful disciples of Christ. The problem is that McFarland refuses to acknowledge the unbiblical aspects of Rick Warren's teachings and has unwisely decided to focus only on the appearance of good.  I can come to no other conclusion but that Warren defenders like Pastor McFarland are either too lazy to examine the evidence against Warren or are simply blinded by their desire to bring worldly success to their churches at whatever cost. To simply point out the good points of Warren's teachings and refuse to address the bad, McFarland has failed his congregation, the Body of Christ at large, and His Lord.

 

"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!" (Isa. 5:20).

Now, I did not say that the use of the five purposes Warren listed were evil (as you have accused me).  But I would like to address what Rick Warren does teach about evil that does cause many to stumble.  Quoting from my book: Rick Warren's Global Peace Plan vs. Scriptural Teachings on Peace, please refer to paragraph later in the document entitled: SO WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF “EVIL” ACCORDING TO RICK WARREN?

 

LEE MCFARLAND:

Just as one example that refutes what the email below …. I just looked at Saddleback’s membership covenant, the same type as Rick Warren recommends for churches to use… it does not in one single place ask you to “swear” or “take an oath”…take a look for yourself…

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

To suggest that you don't swear or take an oath to a covenant is what you do when you sign or attest to a covenant belies the very words of Scripture which states that when God initiated his covenants he swore an oath.  Rick Warren himself even uses Nehemiah as an example of his justifying covenants in his church.  If you don't think Nehemiah's covenant was sworn to, then you need to read the account in the Old Testament.  Jesus even refers to the fact that swearing oaths regarding the Covenant of Moses is exactly what they were doing.  The Old Testament is filled with these examples. Furthermore, this was not really Nehemiah's covenant, but Nehemiah re-instituting the covenant or Law of Moses that God gave to Moses. See 1 Chr. 24:15 & Neh. 10:20.  Is Rick Warren telling us that God gave Rick Warren these new covenants to make binding on his members?  That Testament saints made covenants that they did take oaths to, but Rick Warren's covenants possess no oath?  Too late, we already have the New Covenant.   Luke even uses covenant and oath interchangeably as referring to the same thing:

Luke 1:73 The oath which he sware to our father Abraham,

It is known as the Abrahamic Covenant....so of course a covenant was sworn to.

“I will bring you to the land I swore with uplifted hand to give to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob. I will give it to you as a possession. I am the Lord.”  Exodus 6:8

And again we read:

Act 2:30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;

 

What does Pastor Lee McFarland think one does with a Covenant if not sworn to?    For him to make this statement is just beyond astonishing.  And even if they are not sworn to but simply signed, the net effect is the same when non-signers are removed or purpose-driven out of their church.

 

 

 

LEE MCFARLAND (citing Rick Warren):

The Saddleback Membership Covenant

 

Having received Christ as my Lord and Savior and been baptized, and being in agreement with Saddleback’s statements, strategy and structure, I now feel led by the Holy Spirit to unite with the Saddleback church family.  In doing so, I commit myself to God and to the other members to do the following:

 

I.___ I will protect the unity of my church

...By acting in love toward other members

...By refusing to gossip

...By following the leaders

 

So let us concentrate on the things which make for harmony, and on the growth of our fellowship together.”  Rom. 15:19 (Ph)

Romans 14:19 says this; 'Let us concentrate on the things that make for harmony and the growth of our fellowship together.'  [emphasis James]

 

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

Rick Warren uses the Phillips  translation.  Now let us compare this verse to what the verse really says::

“Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another.” Romans 14:19  KJV

and the Greek:

http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_dir/c/1151946086-8104.html#19 

Note there is nothing in there about church growth!  In fact there is nothing in Scripture that gives us a mandate to grow the church or commandments to do so!  Quoting this subjective translation by J.B. Phillips is one more example of Rick Warren going beyond what is written and and inventing what the Scriptures actually say.  Todd Hudnall, another AOG pastor and international leader of Warren's Purpose Driven Church promoted the same error in the PDC Conference in Nairobi, Kenya, 2005.  So much for the warning of adding to God's Word.  Lee McFarland insists that Warren uses the Bible....but his teaching on church growth, just like Warren 40 Day examples are found nowhere in Scripture.  Forcing fellow Christians out of your church for refusing to sign Warren covenants and marking them the way Warren does, is hardly a way to make peace and edify one another!  Just ask the growing number of saints who have been purpose-driven from their churches (see Spiritual Euthanasia article for more proof). See: http://www.letusreason.org/Current61.htm

 

LEE MCFARLAND:

Live in complete harmony with each other — each with the attitude of Christ toward each other.”  Rom 15:5 (LB)

 

Have a sincere love for your fellow believers, love one another earnestly with all your hearts.”  1 Peter 1:22 (GN)

 

Do not let any unwholesome talk come out of our mouths, but only what is helpful for building others up according to their needs...”  Eph. 4:29

 

Obey your leaders and submit to their authority.  They keep watch over you as men who must give an account.  Obey them so that their work will be a joy, not a burden, for that would be no advantage to you.”  Heb. 13:17

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

Of course, these commands from Scripture must be followed.  But there is nothing in Scripture which even suggests that a brother is to take anything that even resembles an oath or promise with respect to Heb 13:17.  What if the leaders are rotten and corrupt such as Diotrephes in John 3? Our allegiance is not to any man – not even to Rick Warren.  Our allegiance is to Jesus Christ and the Word of God.

LEE MCFARLAND (citing Rick Warren):

II.__ I will share the responsibility of my church

...By praying for its growth

...By inviting the unchurched to attend

...By warmly welcoming those who visit

 

The upcoming “Purpose-Driven, Spirit Led” Conference in April of 2006 has a great title:  “Uncompromised”.    http://www.purposedriven.com/en-US/Events/PurposeDrivenPentecostalCharismatic-LakeForestCA/Uncompromised_home.htm   Rick Warren will be the first to tell you – you don’t have to compromise your theological or spiritual beliefs – especially Pentecostal beliefs – in order to be “purpose-driven”, because purpose-driven is not a program or a theological statement – it is a Biblical model Jesus established for what churches should be doing until Jesus comes back.

 

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

More lies and distortions.  IT IS A THEOLOGICAL STATEMENT AND PROGRAM!  These people are so bold, so brazen, in their distortions that few pay any attention.  They use words the way the Communists do – who cares what it really means except that it sounds good and that the last word is clear:  OBEY POPE RICK OR IT’S CURTAINS FOR YOU!

Your leader, Thomas Trask, U.S. National Assemblies of God National Superintendent has clearly compromised.  Here is proof:

Thomas Trask

General Superintendent of Assemblies of God Tom Trask, general superintendent of the Assemblies of God Church and overseer of Assemblies of God which credentialed Pastor Todd Hudnall, is now helping spearhead the Centennial of the Azusa Street Revival in April 2006 in Los Angeles, where Rick Warren will be a keynote speaker. Some of the other apostate teachers invited to speak at this conference include Kenneth Copeland, T. D. Jakes, Bill Hamon (Apostolic and Prophetic Ministry Today),180 Roman Catholic Francis MacNutt,181 Jack Hayford, David Cho, Creflo Dollar. See www.azuzsastreet100.net/events.htm for speaker roster.”  James Sundquist, Rick Warren's Global Peace Plan vs. Scriptural Teachings on Peace, Bible Belt Publishing, pp. 104-105, 2006

 

LEE MCFARLAND:

There are several of us Assembly of God pastors who will be speaking at this conference, and we do so with complete confidence, knowing that we will in no way compromise our beliefs about our “Pentecostal distinctives”.  There is a pastor from the Calvary Chapel movement who will be speaking… there is a pastor from a non-denominational perspective as well… clearly this Biblical model crosses all denominational lines, without compromising beliefs.

 

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

Chuck Smith, the head of all Calvary Chapels has now come out denouncing Rick Warren's teachings and has now stated that any Calvary Chapel using their materials can no longer be called a Calvary Chapel.   And Calvary Chapel never has “Pentecostal distinctives”...read the history of how it was formed.  Chuck Smith started Calvary Chapel to be NON-denominational and with disctinctives which are NOT the Foursquare (“Pentecostal distinctives”) of Life Bible College, or Assemblies of God for that matter.  Read their history.

 

LEE MCFARLAND:

Just one more example that was made by Mr. Sundquist… that Rick Warren doesn’t have “repentance” in his teaching materials or book… let’s just go straight to what Rick Warren himself has said on the subject:

 

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

This is really Assembly of God Dr. Opal Reddin's statement.  So you are really accusing her of being a false teacher:  She is talking about true biblical repentance and I agree with her as I will prove.  Furthermore, McFarland never read my other examples, evidenced by his comments on things I clearly stated in my books and emails to all of these AOG pastors to whom I sent my complete documentary on Rick Warren.

 

LEE MCFARLAND (citing Rick Warren):

It's OK to Preach Repentance
In fact, that's what preaching is all about.

[Excerpted from Preaching magazine. By Rick Warren]

Rick Warren's preaching has a purpose. He expects people to turn from their old ways. Here are some of his principles on preaching for life change:

1. All behavior is based on belief. If somebody gets a divorce it is because they have a belief behind that: "I think I'll be happier" or whatever.

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

The lies and distortions continue:  What we do is based on whether we are obedient to Christ and His Word or not – as believers.  The pagans are slaves to their lusts, as we once were.  As to whether we believers are obedient or not is based on how much we put the flesh to death and/or give heed to the schemes of the devil.

 

LEE MCFARLAND (citing Rick Warren):

2.  Behind every sin is a lie of unbelieving. You think you are doing what's best for you, but you have been deceived. The Bible tells us that Satan deceives us.

 

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

Simplification is being done here in order to craft people into becoming RW clones.  This is so amazingly naïve and contrary to orthodoxy, I don’t know what to say.  Sin is disobedience. 

LEE MCFARLAND (citing Rick Warren):

3. Change always starts in the mind. "Be transformed by the renewing of your mind" (Rom. 12:2). The Bible teaches clearly that the way we think affects the way we feel, and the way we feel affects the way we act.

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

Once more, it is evident that McFarland did not read my my book (Who's Driving the Purpose Driven Church) with extensive commentary on Warren's misguided teaching on transformation which is in Chapter One.

LEE MCFARLAND (citing Rick Warren):

4. Change beliefs first. Trying to change behavior without changing beliefs is a waste of time. Say I have a boat on auto pilot headed north. If I want it to head south, I have two options: I could wrestle the steering wheel or (the better way) change the auto pilot.

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE: 

Changing what we do must first start with conversion to Christ and then responding to His commands as given in His Word.  If we don’t have His Word, He will impress on our conscience what to do.

Rick Warren loves to talk about boats!  Here is one of his latest What to do when your church hits a plateau, where he states:

 

"If your church has been plateaued for six months, it might take six
months to get it going again. If it's been plateaued a year, it might take a
year. If it's been plateaued for 20 years, you've got to set in for the  duration!

"I'm saying some people are going to have to die or leave. Moses had to
wander around the desert for 40 years while God killed off a million
people before he let them go into the Promised Land. That may be brutally
blunt, but it's true. There may be people in your church who love God
sincerely, but who will never, ever change"

 

No sooner has Warren distanced himself from the Left Behind violent video game for which Warren's PDC Director Mark Carver was one on the board of advisers for that company in which many have to die than he tells his followers that many have to die in churches in order to follow him!  Warren exhibits a more horrific understanding of Exodus than I have ever heard from a pastor.   Warren has it backwards who would really be swallowed up by the earth!  So now Warren is Moses?  All Christians who murmur against Rick Warren's vision from God "have to die"!   Warren has the Exodus story backwards.  It is Warren that needs to let God's people go from the bondage he has put them in!  Warren also has his oil tanker example backwards.  It is the Purpose Driven Church and his Global Peace Plan that is the oil tanker that must turn around.  Had its captain obeyed Scripture this tanker would not have been going in the wrong direction in the first place.  Meanwhile the propeller for Rick Warren's Purpose Driven oil tanker continues to chew up Christians leaving them dismembered as bloodied corpses left in the wake.  And sure enough, Rick Warren is getting his wish!  Those, in Warren's words who "have to die" are Christians.  The earth must swallow up these murmurers as in the book of Exodus simply because they oppose Warren's teachings or refuse to sign his unbiblical covenants?  So Warren is now the Moses for the church of the whole earth?   And remember it was not Moses' decision to cause a million to die for their rebellion, is was God's.  Moses was the humblest man to walk the earth...at least he understood what the book of Exodus really said.  Besides it is not these resisters who are in rebellion...they are simply the messengers.  It is Rick Warren and the hundreds of thousands of pastors and millions who follow him who are in rebellion.  God help us!!

 

And here is what the Berean Call has to say about Warren's article What to do when your church hits a plateau:

[TBC: In this sloppy application of Scripture, Mr. Warren clearly
hasn't  thought through what he has said. Warren admits that these people "love God sincerely," but for the sake of the program they must "die or leave."

Further, we are told in Scripture why the people died in the
wilderness. Whether he realizes it or not, Mr. Warren has identified godly people with the following individuals:

1 Corinthians 10:5: But with many of them God was not well pleased: for
they were overthrown in the wilderness.


 

6: Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust
after evil things, as they also lusted.

7: Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The
people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play.


 

8: Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and
fell in one day three and twenty thousand.

9: Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were
destroyed of serpents.

10: Neither murmur ye, as some of them also murmured, and were
destroyed of the destroyer.

 

And here is Paul Proctor's most incisive News with Views commentary on Rick Warren's incomprehensible and reprehensible article:

http://www.newswithviews.com/PaulProctor/proctor95.htm

* * * * *

 

LEE MCFARLAND (citing Rick Warren):

5.  I don't change people's minds, God's Word does. "We speak words given to us by the Spirit using the Spirit's word to explain spiritual truth" (1 Cor. 2:13 NLT). Both Word and Spirit elements are in preaching, and often we leave out the Spirit element. Spiritual warfare is tearing down mental strongholds. Our weapons have power, pulling down every argument, every pretension.

 

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

This is just another shameful distortion and once again omits what this passage is totally saying.  Rick Warren leaves out the crucial phrase of this verse which  states “not in words which man's wisdom teacheth”  (KJV).  The complete context of this passage also includes verse 12 which states: “spirit of the world”.  Now it is not surprising that Rick Warren leaves this out because his teachings are saturating with this world's wisdom and principles of this world.  Warren compounds his error by not even correctly defining “spiritual warfare” which must describe principalities and demonic spirits that we war against.  I am surprised you did not catch this since you quote Ephesians on spiritual warfare in your letter to Philip Powell!  Dr. Opal Reddin personally sent me much of her own writings on spiritual warfare which she also taught at Central Bible College.  So it is surprising that the leadership of the AOG would buy in to Warren's philosophy.  You won't find these principalities dealt with in Warren's Global Peace Plan either! We are certainly commanded to cast down vain strongholds of imagination (which Warren clears does not do but entertains them and promotes them).  But “an argument” or “mental stronghold” are not the servants of Satan who are masquerading as apostles of Christ.   Spiritual warfare is recognizing that the demonic forces that use Rick Warren's  false teachings to fool people that they are following Christ or that they are, indeed, Christians.  Or, generally, spiritual warfare is first of all recognizing the demonic world’s tremendous power and then asking the Spirit to stop the devil’s power from overcoming us.  The Spirit also helps us to become aware of the devil’s schemes.  But the schemes themselves are not our opposition.  I am shocked that an Assembly of God pastor who should know better would quote this erroneous teaching on spiritual warfare being promulgated by Rick Warren.  For a wake up call, AOG Pastor (Tom Trask, George Wood)  and a host of AOG pastors who promote Warren need to read this Scripture:

 

Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high [places].

LEE MCFARLAND (citing Rick Warren):

6. Changing the way people act is the fruit of repentance. Repentance is not behavioral change; it results in behavioral change. Repentance happens in your mind. That 's why John the Baptist says to produce fruit in keeping with repentance. "I preach that they should repent and turn to God and prove their repentance by their deeds" (Acts 26:20).

 

7. The deepest preaching, bar none, is preaching for repentance. Many preachers are great at interpretation, good at application, but not willing to call for repentance. I preach repentance every Sunday. I talk about "changing your mind" and "paradigm shift." But every message comes down to two words: Will you? "Will you change the way you're thinking?" If you are not preaching repentance, you're not preaching.

Excerpted from Preaching magazine. Rick Warren is pastor of Saddleback Community Church in Lake Forest, California.

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

Not everything Rick Warren says is false.  Nevertheless, truth plus error = error.  All cults and all major religions teach many things which are true...but that is why they are so deceptive!  Pastor Bob DeWaay's commentary on Warren sometimes telling the truth is quite appropriate:

“What we have going on here is people finding places where Warren teaches the truth and using that to defend his whole movement. Personally, I am not claiming that Warren does not know the truth, and in many cases he privately believes it. But when he speaks to the people who need to know the truth the worst, like the readers of PDL, and Ladies Home Journal, and United Nations, then he does not give them the truth, but what he thinks they want to hear. If an evangelical pastor gets a hearing with Warren, Warren will definitely say he believes in repentance. He can get people in his church to say they have heard him talk about it. But does he preach it to the lost? NO!!! He tells them to work on their self esteem.

Warren’s defenders claim that if he teaches some truth in some places, that justifies him teaching lies and errors to the masses. But we are never justified in hiding the truth, misusing the Bible, and teaching error. And if he knows better, then he is all the more blameworthy!” 

Also hear is commentary at: http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/Critical_Issues_Commentary/archives.asp?bcd=2006-7-10.  In this program Brian Flynn and Bob DeWaay discus the gap between private orthodox beliefs and public statements that contradict these that characterize the Purpose Driven movement.  This commentary is brilliant and much needed!

 

LEE MCFARLAND:

Please be encouraged… when people are attacking something like Purpose-Driven Church, it’s because they haven’t actually read about it, or met Rick Warren, or been to the Purpose-Driven Church conferences… but most importantly, they are attributing evil to a man who is just trying to help pastors be better pastors… and trying to help people understand the reason they have been placed on this earth by God…

JAMES SUNDQUIST RESPONSE:

Well I am not encouraged by false teachings and I most certainly am not encouraged by AOG Pastor Lee McFarland and Anthony Niger, II bearing false witness against both Philip Powell and me as well as Dr. Opal Reddin.  Lee McFarland implies that I have not read Rick Warren's writings, or else I would see that he is just trying to help pastors be better pastors.  But I have thoroughly researched Rick Warren's teachings, line by line, precept upon precept and comparing them directly with Scripture.  That is how I know he is a false teacher and his claims are fraudulent.  It has becoming increasingly apparent that Lee McFarland has not even read either of my books on Rick Warren because I answered many of his criticisms already...and yes with documentation.  No I have not met Rick Warren.  But I have not met the Pope, the Dalai Lama, or Dr. Hugh Ross either.  All of their teachings are well-known and published.  So why would I have to meet him?  Is meeting him going to cause fairy dust to come down over my eyes that I would become deceived to believe a false teacher?  I don't have to meet him to mark him. There is no Scripture to prove that Paul or John ever met many of the false teachers they marked.  And I would not need to attend a Purpose Driven Conference to identify Warren as a false teacher...there is already plenty to expose him in his Purpose Driven Life book, Ladies Home Journal column, and radio and television appearances.  Nevertheless, I have listened to the entire tapes of the Purpose Driven Conference in Nairobi, 2005 which I comment on in my second book on Rick Warren.  Had Lee McFarland read that commentary along with Bob DeWaay's commentary on that conference he might not have been so reckless to make his accusations, for I addressed them.  Finally, Rick Warren is not helping pastors be better pastors who simply regurgitate his parade of errors and use his sermons vs. studying the Word primarily to show himself a workman approved.  Rick Warren is deceiving pastors and making them worse pastors and poor shepherds who are not guarding the flock against Warren's false teachings which I have only partly addressed in this letter.  Rick Warren's supposed examples of teaching truth and repentance loses all credibility because elsewhere he contradicts his own teachings as this document proves.  He should not be helping pastors at all, but rather should be disqualified as a pastor!  He has not helped people better understand their place on the earth but confused them and led them astray, and abusively treated resisters through the training he provides churches leaders throughout the world who follow his template. 

Were Rick Warren to preach the unadulterated Word of God and repent to the host of churches, denominations he has led astray, families he has destroyed, and renounce his own books, then perhaps he might help people understand why they have been placed on earth.   You and your pastor partners in the AOG such as Tom Trask, George Wood, Todd Hudnall, Anthony Niger II, Tommy Barnett, Wesley Shortridge, Bill Ellis, Randy D. Rice, Jonathan Chambers, Chris McMillan, Dan Lumadue, Mark Canfield, Rich Fogal, David Crosby, Sr., (AOG District Sec. Treasurer in Pennsylvania), Tom Grazioso, Joe Fuiten, Randy Carter, E.G. Olsen, Chris Hickle, Ken Burtram (Potomac AOG District Sec. Treasurer), Wayde Goodall, and a host of others  who promote Rick Warren and/or have attacked me and Dr. Opal Reddin (many even calling Opal's letter of appeal “spam”) must also repent for you too are all guilty of forming an unholy alliance with him.

You and Rick Warren may have a vast network of Assembly of God Pastors, District Directors, national AOG Supervisors, a half a millions pastors around the world, Rupert Murdock, major secular as well as Christian publishers and Christian radio stations and magazines, and a vast fortune promoting Rick Warren's Purpose Driven Church, Purpose Driven Life, and his programs on how do deal with what George Woods calls “detractors” and Warren calls “resisters” on your side.  But I and many others have one thing you all lack, working in our favor, and that is the truth.  You may be able to snuff out the voice of the righteous widow of Dr. Opal Reddin's, as Tom Trask did.  But I heard her voice, and more importantly the Lord heard her cries.  And those of us who know the truth will not be silenced.  There is a remnant out there who have discernment ministries and who are good Bereans who are not being silenced and will not be silenced.

 

If there still remains any doubt that we are attributing evil to a man unjustly, then I appeal to you to read the following which is more proof regarding Rick Warren.  I don't determine what is evil, Scripture determines this.

 

WHY THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD LEADERS SHOULD HAVE REJECTED RICK WARREN'S  PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE BOOK AND HIS 40 DAYS OF PURPOSE BEFORE THEY EVEN GOT TO DAY ONE OF HIS 40 DAYS OF PURPOSE:

 

RICK WARREN'S 40 DAY INVENTIONS VS. WHAT THE BIBLE REALLY SAYS ABOUT EACH 40 DAY EXAMPLE

 

Noah’s Life was transformed by 40 days of rain” (Purpose Driven Life p. 10)

Is this true? 

 

No!  Noah was not transformed..he had already been transformed and had been preaching for 120 years…the 40 days marked judgment for all of the people on the earth OUTSIDE of the Ark…who drowned! See Genesis 6-9

         

Moses was transformed by 40 Days on Mount Sinai”(Purpose Driven Life p. 10)   Is this true?

 

NO! Moses was given his purpose at the burning bush BEFORE these 40 Days on Mt. Sinai.  See Exodus Chapters 3, 21-25

 

The spies were transformed by 40 Days in the Promised Land” (Purpose Driven Life p. 10)  Is this true? 

 

No!10 Spies were not changed.  2 were already faithful but NONE were transformed        

in the Promised Land” See Numbers 13:30-33

 

David was transformed by Goliath’s 40 Day challenge” (Purpose Driven Life p. 10)   Is this true?

 

NO!  David was already a man after God’s own heart…and didn’t even show up to until the END of Goliath's 40 day challenge.  See I Samuel Chapter 17

 

“Elijah was transformed when God gave him 40 days of strength from a single meal”

(Purpose Driven Life  p. 10)  Is this true?

 

NO!

It was 2 meals to simply strengthen him…and Elijah had already been given his purpose….no transformation here!  See I Kings Chapter 19

 

“The entire city of Nineveh was transformed when God gave the people forty days to change.” (Purpose Driven Life  p. 10) Is this true?

 

NO.  The 40 days were given as a deadline to judgment…but they repented long before then..no process of transformation that took 40 days here!  See Book of Jonah

 

“Elijah was transformed when God gave him 40 days of strength from a single meal”

(Purpose Driven Life p. 10)  Is this true?     

 

NO!  It was 2 meals to simply strengthen him…and Elijah had already been given his purpose….no transformation here!  See I Kings Chapter 19

 

“Jesus was empowered by 40 days in the wilderness.” (Purpose Driven Life p. 10)  Is this true?

 

NO!  This is completely wrong!

Jesus was tempted during the 40 days not empowered…furthermore He was already all powerful and his purpose was already known by Himself before the foundation of the world!  SEE Matthew Chapter 4 Mark Chapter 1, Luke Chapter 4

 

“The disciples were transformed by 40 days with Jesus after his resurrection.”

(Purpose Driven Life, p. 10)    IS THIS RIGHT?

 

NO!  The Disciples were already not conformed to this world and already had their purpose…if anything they were transformed at Pentecost…that’s 50 days, not 40 days!  See Acts 1:3

 

******************

 

RICK WARREN'S COVENANT (P. 13 PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE) VS. SCRIPTURE

 

Aside from the fact that Rick Warren asks you to sign a covenant at the beginning of his book without having read the book to be a good Berean to see if these things be true (who among you would sign a contract before reading it?), and Rick Warren comparing his covenant to Nehemiah (which was really God's covenant given to Moses, simply reinstated), let's see what Jesus Christ and his Apostle James have to say about oaths that Warren makes binding on his congregation, defying even the Apostle Paul who condemning anyone trying to put us back under the law and the traditions of men:

 

“Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:

But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God’s throne: Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King. Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black. But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.”  —Matthew 5:33–37 [emphasis mine]

 

“But above all things, my brethren, swear not, neither by heaven, neither by the earth, neither by any other oath: but let your yea be yea; and your nay, nay; lest ye fall into condemnation.” [emphasis mine]

— James 5:12

 

Dr. Opal Reddin, Professor at Assembly of God's Central Bible College for 24 years,  knew ALL OF THESE THINGS, and reviewed my book and emails before publishing, easily discernible to any good Berean willing to check out the facts in Scripture.  So why didn't Tom Trask, General Supt of the AOG know that Rick Warren's accounts of the 40 Days in the Bible were fiction and fraudulent, and if he did know, that is even more frightening that he would still promote Rick Warren and his programs!  And why didn't a host of AOG Pastors such as Lee McFarland both to check the Scriptures to see if Warren was telling the truth or not?

 

RICK WARREN'S DEFINITION OF EVIL

 

AOG Pastor Lee McFarland insists that Rick Warren really teaches true biblical repentance and that he “simply uses the Bible”.  For you to affirm and quote of Rick Warren's apparent teaching of repentance to carry any credibility whatsoever, it must begin with fear of the Lord which is the beginning of wisdom.  No fear of the Lord, then no beginning of wisdom and without this beginning there can be no repentance for you have removed its foundation.

 

          “If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?”  Psalm 11:3

 

So let's see what Rick Warren teaches about fear of the Lord.  This taken from my book Rick Warren's Global Peace Plan vs. Scriptural Teachings on Peace:

 

Fear of the Lord