Terrorism in the Balkans

Osama bin Laden was the active chief for the KLA (Kosovan Liberation Army) before the Afghanistan war and this allowed the murder of several hundred thousand Serbian Christians and the burning of their churches, homes and villages.  Even the NATO led bombing authorised by Bill Clinton and the Security Council only allowed the radical Islamic factions in the Balkans to rampage and murder more Serb civilians and garner tighter support.  Al Qaeda’s inception actually happened by a Palestinian by the name of Abdullah Azam and its roots go back to the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt.  The training ground for the radicals has been Afghanistan, Russia and the Balkans, now Iraq also.  These guys are well trained in warfare and have had real training fighting few of the battles above so some of them are war veterans who are skilled in the art of war.

    In the past the appeasement of Muslims in Egypt led to the downfall of an Egyptian civilisation and from a Christian nation that were taught to turn the other cheek, there the Christian Coptic today are a minority who have no voice and are ruled by the Islamic warlords and the West does nothing about the human abuses in Egypt.  The same can be said in Sudan where innocent people are being slaughtered in the name of Allah.  Nigeria also has its problem with the north south divide where the Muslims implementing their Sha’ria to force people to Islamic ways.  Where ever Islam has risen in power we see death and destruction.

    The Serbs retaliated in self defence in the Balkans and were dehumanized and portrayed as a people so vicious and evil yet this was just the opposite of what was portrayed by the media.  Today we in the West commemorate the alleged massacre of the 8000 Muslims in Srebrenica.  This is another mistruth that is imposed on us by the democratic elite while the evidence suggests otherwise.  We are repeatedly told reports which people are made to believe only to please the Islamic governments because it helps the status Quo and is good for business.  Were Muslims killed in Balkans?  Yes of course they were killed, some civilian Muslims were killed but it may surprise us that most of the Muslims that were killed during the conflict were in fact combatants fighting the Serbians.

What really happened in Srebrenica?

[1]When the Bosnian Serb Army recaptured the town of Srebrenica five years ago, Dutch UN peacekeepers were the only Western observers present. The Dutch UN peacekeepers ridicule Clinton Administration claims that Serbian troops massacred thousands of disarmed Muslims:

"Everybody is parroting everybody [about Srebrenica] but nobody shows hard evidence. In the Netherlands people want to prove at all costs that genocide has been committed. I don’t believe any of it. The day after the collapse of Srebrenica, July 13, I arrived in Bratunac [alleged massacre site] and stayed there for eight days. I was able to go wherever I wanted to. I was granted all possible assistance; nowhere was I stopped." (Captain Schouten, the ranking UN officer on the scene in Bratunac, Het Parool, 27/07/95, my emphasis)

    Led by the Clinton administration, the Western media has used the Myth of Srebrenica to slander the Serbian people for five years. The idea is: repeat a lie enough times and people will believe it.  But what really happened in Srebrenica? What happened there before the Serbian army recaptured the city?  As we will see, there was a massacre, in fact there were many massacres, but the Serbs were not the villains. They were the victims.

    Islamist terrorists, based in Srebrenica, raided local villages, mutilating and murdering Serbian and moderate Muslim villagers. Innocent civilians, It's a miracle that when the Serbs retook Srebrenica they did not exact revenge.

Islamist leader boast of murder

The UN declared Srebrenica a 'safe zone' in 1993. That meant a) Srebrenica was supposed to be disarmed and b) it was supposed to be safe from attack.

But the UN never disarmed the Islamists who occupied Srebrenica.

    The Islamists "troops" were actually a gang of sadists in the tradition of the local Islamists who joined the Nazi SS during World War II and slaughtered Serbs, "Gypsies" and Jews. Listen to their modern-day incarnation, Commander Nasir Oric, leader of what is called the Bosnian Muslim Army, in Srebrenica: 

"[On the video tape I saw] burning houses, dead bodies, severed heads, and people fleeing. [Commander] Oric grinned throughout, admiring his handiwork. 'We ambushed them,' he said when a number of dead Serbs appeared on the screen.

"The next sequence of dead bodies had been done in by explosives: 'We launched those guys to the moon,' he boasted. When footage of a bullet-marked ghost town appeared without any visible bodies, Oric hastened to announce: 'We killed 114 Serbs there.' Later there were celebrations, with singers with wobbly voices chanting his praises." (Emphasis added, 'Toronto Star,' 16/07/95)

    Note that Oric says his "troops" mutilated and slaughtered innocent villagers, not Serbian troops. In World War II the Nazi Islamists killed by mutilation, using so-called "cold weapons" - knives, hammers, axes. They liked to be photographed with what they called "trophies" - the severed heads of their victims. That was the Nazi past, right? Well, here again is Nasir Oric, Commander of the terrorists, otherwise known as the Bosnian Muslim Army, in Srebrenica: 

"Nasir Oric's war trophies don't line the wall of his comfortable apartment. They're on videocassette tape: burned Serb houses and headless Serb men, bodies crumpled in a pathetic heap. 

'"We had to use cold weapons that night,' Oric explains as scenes of dead men sliced by knives roll over his 21-inch Sony...Reclining on an overstuffed couch, clothed head to toe in camouflage fatigues, a U.S. Army patch proudly displayed over his heart…the Muslim commander is the toughest guy in this town [of Srebrenica], which the U.N. Security Council has declared a protected 'safe area.'"

(Emphasis added, Washington Post, 16/02/94)

    The Clinton administration strongly supported the Muslim regime in Sarajevo.  Oric's killers were that regime's army.  Is this why Oric wore a US army patch? Note that the Post expresses no horror over Oric's unbelievable crimes.

    Oric worked for the Muslim regime in Sarajevo.  The Clinton administration praised that regime as pro-Western and tolerant.

    Well, the head of that regime was and is Alija Izetbegovic. He joined the pro-Nazi Young Muslims in Nazi-occupied Sarajevo in 1943. He helped recruit members of the "SS Handzar Division." He worked with Hitler’s intelligence service (ABWER and GESTAPO). In 1946 he was sentenced by the Yugoslav Military Court to three years in prison for his fascist activities. (1)

Jumping forward to 1990, here's a quote from Izetbegovic's book, "Islamic Declaration:" 

"...There can be no peace or coexistence between the "Islamic faith" and non-Islamic societies and political institutions. ... Islam clearly excludes the right and possibility of activity of any strange ideology on its own turf…and the state should be an expression …of the religion. ..." (Emphasis added, 'Islamska Deklaracija,' p. 22)

    Izetbegovic idolized the Ayatollah Khomeini. His fanatic Islamist movement lost the 1990 elections to Fikret Abdic. Abdic was a moderate Muslim. But the Bush and Clinton administrations backed Izetbegovic who forced Abdic out. Abdic and his moderate Muslim followers allied with the Bosnian Serb Army against Izetbegovic's Islamist fanatics.

The bringing of people to trial in Hague is another thing that needs to be deeply looked at.

Professor Dr. Raju G.C. Thomas talks about his fact finding mission to Yugoslavia; about the Satanization of the Serbs in the West and the role of Court in the Hague. He says: My impression of the intended international war crimes tribunal was that it violated every principle of justice and fair play. The system and process would be thrown out as a cruel farce in any domestic Western democratic society

This is what one General Lewis MacKenzie had to say;

Maj-Gen. Lewis MacKenzie: We bombed the wrong side?       

Written by Salvia[2]    

Wednesday, 07 April 2004[3]

Five years ago our television screens were dominated by pictures of Kosovo-Albanian refugees escaping across Kosovo's borders to the sanctuaries of Macedonia and Albania.  Shrill reports indicated that Slobodan Milosevic's security forces were conducting a campaign of genocide and that at least 100,000 Kosovo-Albanians had been exterminated and buried in mass graves throughout the Serbian province.

NATO sprung into action and, in spite of the fact no member nation of the alliance was threatened, commenced bombing not only Kosovo, but the infrastructure and population of Serbia itself -- without the authorizing United Nations resolution so revered by Canadian leadership, past and present.

Those of us who warned that the West was being sucked in on the side of an extremist, militant, Kosovo-Albanian independence movement were dismissed as appeasers. The fact that the lead organization spearheading the fight for independence, the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), was universally designated a terrorist organization and known to be receiving support from Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda was conveniently ignored.

    Osama bin laden and most of these people following the doctrine of Molana Abu Ala Madudi the Pakistani cleric who wrote several books on the subject and form of jihad.

"Islam wishes to destroy all States and Governments anywhere on the face of the earth, which are opposed to the ideology and programme of Islam regardless of the country or the Nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and programme, regardless of which Nation assumes the role of the standard bearer of Islam or the rule of which nation is undermined in the process of the establishment of an ideological Islamic State."

--Sayeed Abul A'la Maududi, Jihad XE "Jihad – Outward war"  in Islam p9

    That age old question of radical Islam once again to blame the Jews and anyone who tries to help or align them with Israel would be looked at as an enemy by the Islamists.

    The Islamist goal is to conquer the Dar ul Harb (Abode of war) for Allah, so any nation that is not Islamic today is Dar ul Harb by definition and must be conquered.  That means ALL of the West and ALL of the East that is not Islamic today is a legitimate target and there is no such thing as a civilian in Dar ul Harb.

    The problem with the West is they rely on Arab oil and have extensive business contracts with the Arab nations and so in order to accommodate them they try to lean in a certain direction for the favour of the Arab nations but this appeasement will cost us dearly and is already costing us innocent lives in terrorism.

Simon Altaf is the author of the books "Islam, Peace or Beast", “Yeshua or Isa, the true path for Salvation” and has spoken on radio shows/TV shows underlying the dangerous trend the Western Church is heading towards making the way open to Islamism in Great Britain and other European nations which will lead us into great problems.

If you would like him to speak in your meeting or Radio/TV please write to him shimoun63@yahoo.com to make a booking.